skie.io
skie Sage

Your always-optimized cloud starts here

Sage combines FinOps automation and expert guidance to cut cloud costs by 25-50%, across AWS and Azure. It plans right-sizing and commitments together, because changing one changes the answer to the other.

Zero-risk model: pay only on achieved savings. Available through AWS Marketplace.

Proven in productionAWS Advanced Tier Partner·Microsoft Solutions Partner·Available on AWS Marketplace·SOC 2 Type II

Why most tools fail

The connected intelligence difference

Most cloud optimization tools work in silos. Each recommendation looks sensible on its own, but disconnected decisions can actually increase costs or break critical systems.

Blind to commitments

A resize that fights your reservation

A tool tells you to right-size an instance without realizing you hold a 3-year reservation for the current type.

Blind to certification

A family switch that breaks SAP

Or it recommends switching instance families without checking whether your SAP HANA workload is certified for the new type.

Sage is different. We see the complete picture.

Recommendations become results

Who implements the recommendations?

Most tools hand you a list and wish you luck. The reason those lists sit untouched for months is rarely disagreement. Right-sizing an instance means stopping and starting it, and nobody wants to open a change window purely to save money. Sage removes that problem by attaching the change to a window you already run.

1

Sage recommends

A right-sizing run produces the proposed instance type change, with the resource, account and region attached.

2

An action is scheduled

The change becomes a tracked action, set to apply on your next OS patch. The downtime is already budgeted, so the resize costs nothing extra in risk or coordination.

3

Guardian executes it

skie Guardian carries out the change during the patch window, alongside the maintenance work you were doing anyway.

4

The outcome comes back

The result is written onto the recommendation, with timestamps and a status. Applied, pending and cancelled actions are counted, and failures stay visible rather than disappearing.

Record of a completed optimization action to change an instance type, showing a status of applied, the instance identifier, region, the type before and after the change, and the dates it was created and completed.
Every action leaves a record. This one was raised on 13 August and completed on 15 August. It was not run on demand, it waited for the account's patch window. The account name is redacted here because the estate belongs to a customer; nothing else in this record has been altered.

Automated implementation is available today for EC2, RDS and EBS. The estates it runs against include production SAP S/4HANA and HANA database instances.

Sage is one half of a pair.

The other is Guardian, which runs the estate day to day and applies these changes as part of that operation, which is why the recommendations on this page turn into results rather than backlog. See how Guardian operates the estate →

One solve, not three

Why optimize EC2, ECS and EKS together?

Savings Plans and Reserved Instances are shared across EC2, ECS and EKS. Optimize any one of them on its own and you get the other two wrong. Sage solves all three in one run, so the commitment plan reflects the footprint you will actually have after right-sizing rather than the one you have today.

What that looks like in a single optimization run

What the run doesWhy it matters
Cuts right-sizing spend and raises commitment spend in the same planRight-sizing changes the shape of your usage, so the correct commitment position changes with it. Sometimes the cheapest total means buying more commitment, not less. A tool that treats the two separately cannot reach that answer.
Scales one node group up while emptying othersConsolidating workloads onto fewer, better matched node groups can mean growing one of them. The total falls even though a line item rises.
Flags Reserved Instances and Savings Plans as over-committedSage tells you when you are committed beyond the usage you can cover, reconciling every individual commitment against its measured monthly utilization. It is the opposite of the usual incentive to sell you more commitment.
Treats EKS as a fleetNode groups are sized on nodes, cores and memory together, rather than one instance at a time, which is the only way the numbers come out right for Kubernetes.
Carries reservation coverage next to every proposalA resize is never recommended without showing what the current instance is covered by. This is the disconnected-decision problem that raises costs when tools work in isolation.
Cost analysis from a Sage optimization run, showing current and optimized monthly cost broken into ECS on-demand, reserved instances, savings plans and EKS nodes, with a total row.
One run, four cost components. Right-sizing takes the EKS node line down while savings plan spend goes up, because the correct commitment position changed with the footprint. The total falls even though two line items rise.
Commitment coverage panel showing reserved instances and savings plans, each with the monthly amount committed, the usage it covers, and an over-committed warning.
Sage tells you when you have committed too much. Both positions here are flagged as over-committed against measured usage, reconciled commitment by commitment.
EKS node group recommendations table listing node group, cluster, account, instance type change and node count change, with actionable and no change labels.
Some things grow so the total shrinks. One node group goes from one node to two while two self-managed groups empty out entirely. Node groups the optimizer chose not to touch stay in the list, labelled as no change.
EKS fleet right-sizing summary showing node count, core count and memory before and after optimization, each with the reduction and percentage.
Kubernetes is sized as a fleet. Nodes, cores and memory move together, rather than one instance at a time.

Beyond compute

Does this only cover compute?

No. Databases and storage are optimized the same way, and they carry their own commitment instruments rather than borrowing the compute model. A database run reaches across RDS, Aurora and DynamoDB in a single pass, weighing reserved instances and database savings plans against the sizing changes it is proposing at the same time.

Cost analysis for a database optimization run, with a table of five cost components covering reserved instance cost, on-demand cost, Aurora storage cost, database savings plan cost and DynamoDB on-demand cost, each shown before and after.
One run, five cost components. On-demand database spend falls while reserved instance and savings plan spend rises to meet it, DynamoDB on-demand goes to zero, and Aurora storage is left alone because there is nothing to gain there. The same trade-off as compute, with database-specific instruments.
Two panels: cost change split into right-sizing savings, a smaller increase in commitment spend and a minor other category, and the net change in database instance families, with four newer families growing and five older ones shrinking.
Right-sizing is not only shrinking things. Older instance families come down while newer generation families, including the ARM-based ones, go up. Most of the saving here comes from moving databases onto better hardware rather than from running them smaller.

Two measures

How do you know where you stand?

Two measures, and they answer different questions. One tells you how well sized your compute is. The other tells you how well covered that compute is, and what you are paying for and not using. Both are tracked continuously, so the answer is a number rather than an opinion.

Are the machines the right size?

Raw CPU percentages are misleading across a mixed fleet, because a busy small instance and an idle large one do not carry equal weight. Sage normalizes for that: every instance type is weighted by its relative compute capacity, then utilization is measured at the p90 to p99 range rather than the average, so short peaks are not hidden by long quiet periods. The result is one figure for the whole estate.

Is that compute actually covered?

Right-sizing changes what you need to cover, so coverage has to be read against the sized footprint rather than the original one. Alongside it, Sage tracks the commitments you are paying for and not using, and when your existing commitments expire.

Capacity-weighted utilization summary showing p90 to p99 percentages for all time and for the previous month, each carrying a well utilized rating, above a six month trend chart of the same four percentiles.
A right-sizing score for the whole estate. Percentiles for all connected accounts, the previous month alongside it for comparison, and six months of trend so you can see whether sizing discipline is holding or drifting.
Four charts: unutilized commitments by month in dollars, unutilized spend as a percentage of on-demand equivalent, and the value of reserved instances and savings plans expiring in each future month.
Waste and the expiry cliff, tracked monthly. The top row is commitment you are paying for and not using, in dollars and as a share of spend. The bottom row is when your existing reserved instances and savings plans run out, which is what determines when the next buying decision falls due.

The Sage Commitment Portfolio Engine

Turn complex cloud commitments into maximum savings

Before

Commitments bought one at a time

  • On-demand, no discount
  • 1-year commitment, 30% off
  • 3-year commitment, 50% off

25%blended discount, typical for self-managed

Sage weighs

Six signals, continuously

  • Hourly usage patterns
  • Spend forecast
  • License implications
  • Right-sizing headroom
  • Standard or Convertible
  • Term laddering

Rebalanced monthly

After

A layered commitment portfolio

InstrumentCoverageDiscount
Standard RI + RI Volume Discount20%75%
Instance Savings Plans25%70%
Compute Savings Plans30%50%
Convertible RIs25%50%

60%blended discount across a 3-year ladder

While others guess at commitments, Sage orchestrates a sophisticated portfolio strategy that achieves a 60% blended discount vs. the typical 25%.

Modelled example. The coverage split and discount depths shown are AWS list rates for a representative estate; your blended result depends on your own usage mix.

Four stages, repeated

How Sage builds your optimal commitment portfolio

1

Deep usage analysis

  • Hourly usage patterns across all instances
  • Workload migration opportunities (Graviton, modernization)
  • Spot instance eligibility assessment
2

Commitment strategy design

  • Instance family standardization recommendations
  • Multi-year discount optimization
  • Regional vs. global coverage decisions
3

Portfolio construction

  • Layer commitments for maximum coverage
  • Balance flexibility with discount depth
  • Account for volume discounts and spreading options
4

Continuous optimization

  • Monitor utilization in real-time
  • Adjust for workload changes
  • Maximize new instance family opportunities

The Sage advantage

A 60% blended discount vs. 25% from typical approaches

And the flexibility others can't offer.

CapabilityBasic approachSage portfolio
Blended discount25%60%
Considers hourly patterns✕✓
Instance standardization✕✓
Commitment flexibility✕✓
Spreading capability✕✓
Expert review✕✓

"Sage didn't just save us money—it transformed how we think about cloud commitments. The portfolio approach delivered 58% savings while actually reducing our risk."

VP Infrastructure, Fortune 500 Company

Deliverables

What do you actually get?

Three concrete outputs from every run, all exportable.

Right-sizing recommendations

Per resource: the current and proposed instance type, the account and region, an efficiency score before and after, and the commitment coverage already attached to it. Resources that should be left alone are labelled as such rather than quietly dropped.

A commitment buy plan

Line items you can execute: region, instance family, platform, term, payment option, hourly rate and annual cost, split across Instance Savings Plans, Compute Savings Plans and Convertible Reserved Instances.

An honest disruption estimate

How many instances would change family or vCPU count if you acted on the plan. The cost of acting is stated up front, not discovered afterwards.

Coverage

What Sage optimizes

Comprehensive optimization across all major cloud services, on AWS and Azure.

Compute

  • AWS EC2 Instances
  • AWS Compute Reservations and Savings Plans
  • AWS Container Services (ECS/EKS)
  • Azure Virtual Machines
  • Azure Scaling Sets
  • Azure Virtual Machine Reservations and Savings Plans
  • Licensing (Microsoft, Oracle and SUSE)

Storage

  • AWS S3 Buckets & Lifecycle
  • AWS EBS Volumes
  • AWS EFS & FSx
  • Azure Managed Disks
  • Azure Files
  • Azure Blobs
  • Azure Storage Reservations
  • Backup & Archives

Databases

  • AWS RDS Instances
  • AWS ElastiCache, Redis and Valkey
  • AWS OpenSearch
  • Azure SQL Database
  • Azure SQL Managed Instance
  • Azure Database for PostgreSQL
  • Database Reservations

And more

  • AWS Load Balancers
  • AWS Elastic IP
  • Commitment Portfolio Management
  • Automation: apply recommendations

On AWS, depth by service

ServiceDepthWhat Sage does
EC2OptimizedRight-sizing and re-typing, commitment planning, automated implementation
ECSOptimizedIncluded in the shared compute commitment solve
EKSOptimizedNode group fleet sizing across nodes, cores and memory, plus the shared commitment solve
RDSOptimizedRight-sizing, reserved instance planning, automated implementation
EBSOptimizedVolume type and size optimization, automated implementation
ElastiCacheOptimizedRight-sizing and reserved node planning
OpenSearchOptimizedRight-sizing and reserved instance planning
S3, EFS, FSxVisibilityInventory, spend attribution and reporting
DynamoDB, Redshift, TimestreamVisibilityInventory, spend attribution and reporting
Load balancers, NAT gateways, elastic IPsVisibilityInventory and spend attribution, with idle resource reporting
AWS spend dashboard showing total, on-demand and committed spend for the month with trend indicators, a breakdown of the previous month by service, and eighteen month spend histories by service, by region and by account.
The visibility layer Sage works on top of. Total, on-demand and committed spend with month on month movement, the previous month broken down by service, and eighteen months of history by service, region and account. Optimization decisions are only as good as the spend picture underneath them.

Go deeper on your cloud

Why teams choose Sage

Savings you can count on, with no risk

25-50% cost reduction

Our proven optimization strategies consistently deliver 25-50% cost savings. Most clients see results in their first 90 days. Across all our customer base running Sage through 2025, realised cloud spend fell 41% on average against their pre-optimization run rate.

Zero risk model

Pay only on achieved savings. No upfront costs, no monthly fees. If we don't save you money, you don't pay us anything.

Expert support

Dedicated team of certified FinOps and DevOps experts guide you through every optimization, ensuring successful implementation.

Multi-cloud ready

Optimize across AWS and Azure with a single platform. Get unified visibility and optimization recommendations for your entire cloud estate.

Automated execution

Get recommendations and implement them automatically. Our platform integrates with your tools for continuous optimization.

Continuous optimization

Cloud usage changes constantly. Sage continuously monitors and optimizes, ensuring you're always running at peak efficiency and at the lowest cost.

Proven results

Navisite: "We saved $3M annually in just 7 months." Join hundreds of companies achieving similar transformational savings.

Enterprise ready

Handle complex multi-account environments, standardize instance families, and manage commitments across your entire organization.

After optimization

What happens after the spend comes down?

Optimization is not the end state. It is what creates the room to build.

Customer arc

Growth that lands on an optimized baseline

One customer's AWS consumption fell from roughly $44K a month to $29K after the first optimization pass, then grew to $126K as they expanded onto the platform, with no additional cloud operations headcount. The growth landed on an optimized baseline rather than an inherited one, so the new workloads were sized correctly from the day they were built.

See how this works for growing teams
$44KBeforeOPTIMIZE$29KAfter first passOPERATE & SAVE$126KAs they scaledINNOVATE

Monthly AWS consumption for a single customer estate. Figures rounded. Consumption growth reflects new workloads the customer chose to build; it is reported alongside the optimization work, not attributed to it.

Common questions

Before you ask

What does a first optimization pass typically find?
A right-sizing recommendation for every resource in scope, a commitment plan solved against the post-right-sizing footprint, and a stated count of how many instances would change. Savings are quoted against one of three priced scenarios rather than as a percentage. The assessment is free and runs against your real usage.
Will it recommend resizing something that is under a reservation?
Every right-sizing proposal shows the commitment coverage on the resource it applies to, and the commitment plan is solved against the post-right-sizing footprint. That connection is the point of running a single pass across compute rather than optimizing each service in isolation.
Does Sage make changes to my infrastructure automatically?
Only where you allow it, and only inside a maintenance window you control. Changes for EC2, RDS and EBS become scheduled actions that Guardian applies during your next patch window. Every action keeps a record showing what changed, when, and whether it succeeded.
Can Sage tell me I have bought too much commitment?
Yes. Reserved Instances and Savings Plans are reconciled against measured utilization, and over-committed positions are flagged. Every individual commitment is listed with its monthly commitment against its monthly usage.
Does it work with Kubernetes?
EKS node groups are sized as a fleet, across node count, cores and memory together, and EKS shares the compute commitment solve with EC2 and ECS.
What baseline are savings measured against?
Sage prices three scenarios: no commitments at all, your current mix, and the optimized plan. Savings are always stated against one of those rather than as an unattributed percentage.
How often does it run?
Optimizations can be run on demand or in batches, and each run is stored as a dated snapshot so plans can be compared over time. Analyses older than thirty days are flagged as stale.
Can we buy this through AWS Marketplace?
Yes. Sage, Guardian and Muse are all transactable through AWS Marketplace, so spend applies against your existing AWS commitment.

Free cloud cost assessment

Discover your savings potential

Get a detailed report showing exactly how much you can save and where the opportunities lie. No commitment required.

  • AI-powered analysis of your entire cloud infrastructure
  • Detailed savings projections by service and resource
  • Risk-free recommendations with implementation roadmap
  • Results delivered in 2 weeks or less
  • No access to sensitive data required
  • Read-only access to cost and usage reports
  • White-glove service from cloud experts
  • 100% free with no obligations

Perfect for organizations with growing cloud spend

1

Quick setup

Provide read-only access to your AWS Cost Explorer or Azure Cost Management. We handle the rest with zero disruption to your operations.

2

Deep analysis

Sage analyzes your usage patterns, identifies inefficiencies, and calculates savings opportunities across all services and resources.

3

Detailed report

Receive comprehensive recommendations, projected savings, and a clear implementation roadmap you can execute immediately.

Start with your own numbers

See what Sage finds in your account

A free assessment runs against your real usage and shows exactly where the savings are, with a roadmap you can act on. You only pay on savings achieved.